I believe Galileo is a good initiative to teach things differently and it can be fun. In fact at first I was enjoying myself, but it all went pear shaped when I found out the numerous problems and obstacles I was about to face.
So I thought about an excellent proposition that would have solved everybody’s problems at once… But it was turned down because we were told that it was impossible to change the arrangements that were set at the beginning of the term and now no one is happy. As a compromise, we were offered a chance to state our concerns at the final project, in other words to humiliate each other. Obviously it was the last thing I wanted. So overall my experience was not exactly a pleasant one. Galileo could have been much, much more productive if it wasn’t such an inflexible, rigid system.
Galileo is based on teamwork. Teamwork is a concept that has been drummed into our heads since we were little. Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not completely against teamwork, but I know it only works when people are united by common interests. Unfortunately in Galileo we aren’t put in groups that have common interests. Now when I mean interests I’m not talking about aviation, but I’m talking about goals or things we would like to achieve. We also get criticised if the team project doesn’t work, like as if it was our fault. I believe that there should be more flexibility in these groups.
I am writing this as there are some serious flaws in the system. Someone could do no work at all for the whole term, and give themselves 100 on everything at the final exhibition and get away with it.